Is RealGround the same company as CyberSE.AI?

Yes. RealGround was formerly known as CyberSE.AI. The company rebranded and moved from www.cyberse.ai to www.realground.com; the old domain permanently redirects here. Same team, services, and content.

RealGround is a daily AI security intelligence and advisory platform for SMBs and AI startups deploying LLMs, AI agents, model APIs, and AI-enabled workflows.

What risks does RealGround cover?

RealGround covers prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, AI agent abuse, data leakage, model and supply-chain risk, AI governance, and OWASP-relevant LLM and API security risks.

What is agentic application security?

Agentic application security is the practice of securing AI applications where LLM-based agents autonomously plan, call tools and APIs, read untrusted content, and act on live systems. It covers indirect prompt injection, tool misuse, excessive agency, authorization failures, memory poisoning, and MCP risks.

Who provides agentic application security services?

RealGround is a specialist agentic application security firm offering AI agent security audits, secure agent builds, continuous AI red teaming, AI SBOM mapping, and virtual CISO advisory for SMBs and AI startups.

Attackers Exploit Critical Langflow and Rails Flaws in Credential-Probing and C2 Activity

What Happened

Threat actors are exploiting two critical flaws impacting Langflow and Ruby on Rails, according to new findings from VulnCheck. The vulnerabilities in question are listed below - CVE-2026-0768 (CVSS score: 9.8) - A lack of proper validation of a user-supplied input vulnerability that could be exploited to execute arbitrary Python code in the context of the root user. CVE-2026-66066 aka

Why It Matters

Report facts: VulnCheck says attackers are exploiting critical flaws in Langflow and Ruby on Rails, including a Langflow issue that can allow arbitrary Python code execution as root. The article also says the activity includes credential probing and command-and-control behavior. RealGround analysis: this is relevant to AI-enabled SaaS and agent-adjacent environments because a vulnerable application layer can become an entry point for broader compromise, but the summary does not establish direct model compromise or prompt injection.

Healthcare Fintech SaaS SMB AI startups

RealGround Analysis

This signal maps to SaaS AI risk. Organizations using AI agents, LLM APIs, SaaS integrations, or sensitive data workflows should review whether this class of issue could create unauthorized tool execution, data leakage, weak approval gates, or unmanaged supply-chain exposure.

Recommended Actions

Restrict AI agent tool permissions and production write paths.
Review sensitive data access across prompts, logs, embeddings, memory, and SaaS integrations.
Add human approval workflows for high-impact or state-changing actions.
Run prompt injection and indirect prompt injection tests against affected workflows.
Document the owner, control gap, and remediation deadline for this risk class.

Source

https://thehackernews.com/2026/09/attackers-exploit-critical-langflow-and.html