Is RealGround the same company as CyberSE.AI?

Yes. RealGround was formerly known as CyberSE.AI. The company rebranded and moved from www.cyberse.ai to www.realground.com; the old domain permanently redirects here. Same team, services, and content.

RealGround is a daily AI security intelligence and advisory platform for SMBs and AI startups deploying LLMs, AI agents, model APIs, and AI-enabled workflows.

What risks does RealGround cover?

RealGround covers prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, AI agent abuse, data leakage, model and supply-chain risk, AI governance, and OWASP-relevant LLM and API security risks.

What is agentic application security?

Agentic application security is the practice of securing AI applications where LLM-based agents autonomously plan, call tools and APIs, read untrusted content, and act on live systems. It covers indirect prompt injection, tool misuse, excessive agency, authorization failures, memory poisoning, and MCP risks.

Who provides agentic application security services?

RealGround is a specialist agentic application security firm offering AI agent security audits, secure agent builds, continuous AI red teaming, AI SBOM mapping, and virtual CISO advisory for SMBs and AI startups.

Marimo Notebook Flaw Could Run MCP Commands Before Cells Execute in Edit Mode

What Happened

Marimo has addressed a high-severity security flaw in its notebook software that allowed an attacker to execute an attacker-supplied Model Context Protocol (MCP) command in a specially crafted notebook, according to VulnCheck's CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) record. The CNA record says the command can run as a local subprocess when the notebook is opened in edit mode. The vulnerability, tracked

Why It Matters

Reported facts: Marimo fixed a high-severity vulnerability in its notebook software where opening a specially crafted notebook in edit mode could trigger an attacker-supplied Model Context Protocol (MCP) command as a local subprocess, according to a VulnCheck CNA record. This means malicious content embedded in notebooks could execute commands before any user cell runs. RealGround analysis: This flaw illustrates AI supply chain risk where developer or notebook tooling around AI models can become a command-execution vector. Organizations using such AI notebooks should treat them like code, enforce provenance and scanning of shared notebooks, and include AI-specific tools (like MCP integrations) in SBOMs and security readiness assessments.

Healthcare Fintech SaaS SMB AI startups

RealGround Analysis

This signal maps to AI supply chain. Organizations using AI agents, LLM APIs, SaaS integrations, or sensitive data workflows should review whether this class of issue could create unauthorized tool execution, data leakage, weak approval gates, or unmanaged supply-chain exposure.

Recommended Actions

Restrict AI agent tool permissions and production write paths.
Review sensitive data access across prompts, logs, embeddings, memory, and SaaS integrations.
Add human approval workflows for high-impact or state-changing actions.
Run prompt injection and indirect prompt injection tests against affected workflows.
Document the owner, control gap, and remediation deadline for this risk class.

Source

https://thehackernews.com/2026/08/marimo-notebook-flaw-could-run-mcp.html