Is RealGround the same company as CyberSE.AI?

Yes. RealGround was formerly known as CyberSE.AI. The company rebranded and moved from www.cyberse.ai to www.realground.com; the old domain permanently redirects here. Same team, services, and content.

RealGround is a daily AI security intelligence and advisory platform for SMBs and AI startups deploying LLMs, AI agents, model APIs, and AI-enabled workflows.

What risks does RealGround cover?

RealGround covers prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, AI agent abuse, data leakage, model and supply-chain risk, AI governance, and OWASP-relevant LLM and API security risks.

What is agentic application security?

Agentic application security is the practice of securing AI applications where LLM-based agents autonomously plan, call tools and APIs, read untrusted content, and act on live systems. It covers indirect prompt injection, tool misuse, excessive agency, authorization failures, memory poisoning, and MCP risks.

Who provides agentic application security services?

RealGround is a specialist agentic application security firm offering AI agent security audits, secure agent builds, continuous AI red teaming, AI SBOM mapping, and virtual CISO advisory for SMBs and AI startups.

The Fourth Battlefield: The Growing Role of Cyber Operations in Global Conflict

What Happened

CrowdStrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch discusses how cyber operations support kinetic warfare, signal coming conflicts, and reshape the global battlefield. The post The Fourth Battlefield: The Growing Role of Cyber Operations in Global Conflict appeared first on SecurityWeek .

Why It Matters

The article explains how nation-state cyber operations now systematically accompany and enable kinetic warfare, serving purposes such as espionage, regime change support, and territorial conflict preparation.[1] It emphasizes that cyber campaigns are used to weaken infrastructure, disrupt command and control, and signal or shape upcoming physical conflicts, making cyberspace a fully integrated fourth battlefield alongside land, sea, and air.[1][17] From a RealGround perspective, this normalization of state-level offensive cyber operations heightens the risk that similar tradecraft, tooling, and tactics will be repurposed against AI systems and agents, including using cyber intrusion to hijack AI-driven decision flows or data pipelines in wartime or crisis scenarios. Organizations operating AI-enabled platforms should continuously red-team their systems against nation-state-grade intrusion, persistence, and manipulation techniques to ensure that AI agents cannot be co-opted or weaponized as part of broader cyber-kinetic campaigns.

Healthcare Fintech SaaS SMB AI startups

RealGround Analysis

This signal maps to malicious AI use. Organizations using AI agents, LLM APIs, SaaS integrations, or sensitive data workflows should review whether this class of issue could create unauthorized tool execution, data leakage, weak approval gates, or unmanaged supply-chain exposure.

Recommended Actions

Restrict AI agent tool permissions and production write paths.
Review sensitive data access across prompts, logs, embeddings, memory, and SaaS integrations.
Add human approval workflows for high-impact or state-changing actions.
Run prompt injection and indirect prompt injection tests against affected workflows.
Document the owner, control gap, and remediation deadline for this risk class.

Source

https://www.securityweek.com/the-fourth-battlefield-the-growing-role-of-cyber-operations-in-global-conflict/